Saturday, July 21, 2007

Still Moving: Richard Serra



It's tempting, in thinking about the Richard Serra show at MoMA, to talk about the pieces in terms of risk. Some works foreground their own toxicity, even if not as explicitly as does Gutter Corner Splash: Late Shift, and even though this foregrounding may not be intrinsic to the work, but rather to SFMOMA's warning signs. Others loom ominously over — and, in one case, directly above — the museum-goer, threatening a terrifying noise and even more devastating loss of limb and life. And in each case, there's a temptation, at once offset and encouraged by plexiglass partitions, not only to touch, but to push, perhaps as part of an investigation into their sturdiness and monumentality, both of which are offset by the sense of a more fragile equipose and balance upon which the sculptures are built.

In the large-scale pieces, this interplay of temptation and risk manifests itself as attraction and repulsion, where I mean these terms not in their merely aesthetic senses (i.e., desire and disgust), but in terms of physics. I am drawn closer to those corners where steel arcs overhead, but seem to be forced back. Where Serra's tendency to foreground experience seems to demand a personal, rather than objective response, this "forcing back" seems, paradoxically, not to be rooted in subjective fears, but in the physical property of magnetic repulsion, as inexorable as the earthward pull of gravity that allows for the carefully balanced dialectical synthesis of weightlessness and mass that allows for the work's existence.

Or, to put it another way, the experience of Serra's sculptures is an experience of activity, of interaction among and between objects.


Serra's "Verb List Compilation" reminds us that the art object exists as the result of actions performed on materials — a simple truth of any work of art, but rendered in the sculptures at simplicity's extreme, even if their scale comes, in turn, to complicate the notion of simplicity. The list, especially when drawn in relation to static objects, recalls the assertion made by Adam Smith and reiterated by Noah Webster, that all nouns were born as verbs. "[T]he verb," the lexicographer asserts, "is primarily the root of most words, probably of all — from the verb are formed nouns; and from these nouns are formed verbs." Elsewhere, he writes: "Motion, action, is, beyond all controversy, the principal source of words." Put into practice, this shows the lexicographer to figure action as meaning's foundation:
The human body is named from shaping, that is, setting, fixing, or extending, and hence sometimes, the general name of the human race. The arm is a shoot, a push, as is the branch of a tree. A board, a table, a floor, is from spreading, or expanding, extending. Skin, and bark are from peeling, stripping, &c.

This theory of language, which opens possibilities for thinking things otherwise, is especially relevant to the experience of Serra's art. And his list of verbs should have been printed, in a font as large as the pieces' scale, on the wall of one of the galleries. To recall the list is to foreground not only the pieces' genesis, but their presence. To see these works — and especially the larger ones — is to experience mass as energy, as force.

That is to say that Serra's pieces are not "action sculptures" in the way that Pollock's are "action paintings" — not the result of action, but actions performed and ongoing in the moment of their viewing. For their stability is rooted not in movement's opposite, but in its equipose, in tensions carefully set one against the other, such that the museum's title for the survey of its film collection, Still Moving, might have been better applied to these sculptures.



15 comments:

Steven Fama said...

Bravo for putting the notion of "risk" in the work of Richard Serra in the first sentence of your post.

Serra claims (on NPR, google it up) that his crews take no chances given the fatal accident circa 1970 in Minneapolis involving one of his works.

Yet here's the lead from a NY Times article, October 27, 1988:

"Two workers were injured, one seriously, when a 16-ton steel sculpture toppled on them in a SoHo art gallery yesterday morning, pinning the men for several minutes. Two workers were injured, one seriously, when a 16-ton steel sculpture toppled on them in a SoHo art gallery yesterday morning, ..."

Yep, it was another Richard Serra work that hurt people.

Serra's vision and work, while presumably not so intended, do directly put real people at real risk. Serra has been quoted as saying there's no need to go into the accidents -- at least the Minneapolist one -- but I do think about them, and think others should too, in thinking about his contribution to our world.

I mean, the idea of moving in and setting up a 16-ton piece of steel in an art gallery strikes me as inherently dangerous, and an artist (and gallery owner) who insists it be done ask for trouble. And trouble is what Serra and Leo Castelli got. I think there's blood on their hands.

steve roberts said...

I think your view of Serra is right on. Did I tell you the anecdote about the photographer at MoMa taking stills for the borchures? He had to get up in a dangerously unsafe rig to get above all the works. Everyone was worried he was going to fall, but he didn't. Then, leaving the MoMa and getting into a cab, another cab sped by and clipped off his thumb.

lepeep said...

Steve,
I think the term "risk" in this context is about risk in making art (the risk of “failure”) - not physical risk (being squashed)...

It's a fantastic blog / post all in all - a great critique of the concepts - I've been a fan of the "list of verbs" for a long time now - it always excites me to think of the simple and infinite possibility the situation affords...

egypt-panorama.com said...

I think your view of Serra is right on.
Thanks!

Egyptian forum said...

Did I tell you the anecdote about the photographer at MoMa taking stills for the borchures? He had to get up in a dangerously unsafe rig to get above all the works.

Anonymous said...

http://arno.60.vox.com/

Anonymous said...

hi

my new websites

http://rostock-reisen.blogspot.com/


cy

أخبار مصر said...

thanks for you this information

Unknown said...

Really useful blog.Good work keeping this updated!Thanks a lot!Movers Austin Texas

منتديات مصر توداى said...


مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة مصر بث مباشر اون لاين بدون تقطيع

منتديات مصر توداى said...


مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة مصر بث مباشر اون لاين بدون تقطيع


منتديات مصر توداى


مصر توداى


اخبار مصر اليوم


اخر اخبار مصر

منتديات مصر توداى said...


مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة مصر بث مباشر اون لاين بدون تقطيع


منتديات مصر توداى


مصر توداى


اخبار مصر اليوم


اخر اخبار مصر

Anonymous said...

Aside from being an effective antiaging solution, apples [url=http://ywashst.com]buy lifecell cream[/url] of the very most powerful in many components of the world not too long ago. lifecell While the natural extracts inside the lotion helps you to rebuild cellular matrix http://lfcream.com characteristics the effective organic and natural mixture of Cynergy TK, Phytessence Wakame, and grape seed oil.

Anonymous said...

May I simply say what a relief to uncover somebody that really knows
what they're talking about on the internet. You actually understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More and more people should check this out and understand this side of your story. I was surprised you're
not more popular because you surely have the gift.


Feel free to surf to my homepage william shakespeare quotes

Anonymous said...

And, in a room full of gays it's difficult to know what's chat gay madrid ipad going to happen (or not happen). what we done meet [url=http://gaychatodalar5119.soup.io/]gay speed dating brighton[/url] each other in town, went out for a meal. Im at a level Eight on the list which means that while Im still very discreet, Im comfortable enough to go to a Gay club or a date another masculine discreet man. I've spread the Guyliner best gay dating apps australia magic - or should that be tragic - far and wide, but I don't want the boys next door to miss out. These sites actually tend to have much higher success rates with leading people to sexual encounters, but it is also possible to find a lasting relationship on these sites as well. This keeps the channels of communication [url=http://gaymeetingsparis8924.soup.io/]find gay inmates[/url] open and can help renew the relationship, reinforcing the positives and uncovering areas in need of attention before things get too misguided. Why is it wrong for two loving people to be in a committed relationship? But I also wanted [url=http://www.webjam.com/bestgayhivdatingsite5158]best gay hiv dating site[/url] to include the serious with some of the very poignant stories I heard. This requires a level of superficiality and stupidity, usually reserved for Catholic priests and high school history teachers, but you can gay speed dating nyc do it because I believe in you. Local gay newspapers were replaced by national glossy magazines that, in an effort to appeal to a national public of prosperous gay individuals who could afford the products advertised in their pages, became increasingly uncontroversial, commercial, and lightweight, eventually turning into the gay equivalent of in-flight magazines. There were the usual issues about whose turn it was to cook [url=http://quqobydy.liveblog.com/post/612315]do men look gay with earrings[/url] and who did the housekeeping. This is a grave sin against both God and man. He wasnt even hiding or carrying [url=http://questionpro.com/t/AK4ypZRGa0]gay chat apps ipod[/url] on with her in another neighbourhood. Question 1: It is my first day tomorrow and I am freaking about whether I should gay meet werribee be open about my sexual orientation!